More Pages: Bryan Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69


Good overview, lean on intangible issues
Deceptive title, but still a good bookThis book is about the development and war time use of the German tank.
There is a great deal of good information, even if it isn't written in a way that keeps you on the edge of your seat.
The author did make some good points about major events in the war that you never hear about. His reason for the Germans stopping outside Dunkirk sheds some new light on the debate.
I personally found it annoying that the author had such a dim view of Rommel, and I found all of his views about his poor leadership very easy to argue away.
There is bery little actual combat action in the book, and most of that is at the battlegoup, or division level.
This is not an action packed book, but the author did his homework, and has some very interesting information on German tanks and their operational useage during the war. You won't see this information in any other book or History Channel show.
An Excellent, Helpful Source

Not Hornblower--but a good biographyHowever, we should be grateful that this dubious premise sold the book, because Perrett has provided us with a very solid biography of a typical naval officer of this period. Gordon is not in the first rank of Napoleonic naval officers, but the variety of his experiences and actions shows the type of man who made the British navy great. With the skill of the true historian, Perrett has dug out details of long forgotten actions and campaigns. His style is readable, and he has an eye for the sort of detail that adds zest to a biography.
a good book, worth the money
A good read for Hornblower fans and naval history buffs!

EXCITING HISTORY OF USA LAW ENFORCEMENT
Great educational resource!
The Role of Police in American SocietyThe text begins with the first night watch and ends with an article about women in police work written in 1997. The authors have presented the actual articles, speeches, and court cases so that you may read them and view them as they were written and allowing you to interpret them as though you were there at that time. It also presents personal view points of the people involved in law enforcement and the issues that they faced and helped to change.


Updated Madness is Mod
A solid entry into the Mage line . . .The book is divided into four sections - Nephandi, Marauders, Infernalists, and Umbrood. The Nephandi chapter is probably the best - it gives scads of information on all manner of Nephandic beings, practices, and yes, even the Spheres of the Qlippoth. The Nephandic chapter is solid and useful. And the art takes a turn for the disturbing . . . *shudder*
The Marauder chapter is also fun, but not quite so fun as the chapter on Nephandi. There's a lot of chatter about just what Marauders are. In short, it tells you all the things you need to know in order to create a Marauder or even to play as one.
The chapter on Infernalism is detailed and interesting, and probably the most utile one in the entire book (utile, yes, but not as interesting as the one on the Nephandi). There's information on Soul Trade, various demons, and anything you need to add the ultimate seeker of power into your chronicle. However, I wouldn't give the players the power of infernalism, considering how easy it is to become powerful quickly . . .
Finally, the chapter on Umbrood. This is where the chapter falls down. It's done almost entirely in a series of letters, which can get old really fast. In truth, I didn't even read the whole thing. It just got old very, very quickly.
All together, the Book of Madness is an essential read for anybody who wants to create a Mage chronicle involving the wilder side of the Mage universe.


Overall, an excellent text for beginners or veterans...
great in giving feel about what is being talked about

The Successful ExperimentThe Ironclads of Cambrai consists of fifteen chapters, beginning with several on the creation of the Tank Corps and early actions in Flanders. The author provides considerable detail on the development of the plan for the attack at Cambrai, beginning with the efforts by tank enthusiasts to mount an operation that would validate the combat effectiveness of the new weapon. Interestingly, the British chose the Cambrai sector where the German Hindenburg Line defenses were thickest but the ground was suitable. Apparently, the Germans had begun to believe that their defenses in this sector were indeed impregnable and did not react seriously to indications of a British offensive. The Ironclads of Cambrai provides a clear example of the Clausewitzian dialectic in action; the Germans dug extra-wide trenches to inhibit tank attacks but the British developed "fascines" to fill in the trenches. Indeed, the Germans were so smug about the ability of their wire and trenches to stop British tank attacks that they neglected to issue much armor-piercing ammunition to the front-line units near Cambrai. The author's narrative is also supported by many simple, but effective sketch maps.
Obviously the author's main argument is that Cambrai demonstrated that tanks offered a way out of the deadlock of trench warfare. Cooper is fervently pro-tank throughout the book and delights in exposing the numerous British officers who criticized tanks before Cambrai. There is little doubt that the first six hours of the British attack on 20 November 1917 stunned both sides; three front-line German divisions were routed at small cost but the British had not really anticipated such rapid movement. Unfortunately, the British plan began unravel from the start due to a variety of factors. Foremost, one of the British division commanders (Harper of the 51st) - a tank-hater - mis-used his armor and his unit was held up long enough to interfere with the units on either flank. Although Cooper doesn't attach much importance to it, the British failure to adequately plan for engineering assets to help get tanks across the Canal de l'Escaut was a major factor inducing culmination in the British attack. However, Cooper does differ from some other accounts of Cambrai that cite the lack of sufficient reserves as the reason the attack failed to reach Cambrai. Cooper notes, "the lack of reserves was undoubtedly a vital factor at Cambrai, but it can be over-emphasized...there were more reserves available; but the Higher Command were not willing to make use of them for the initial attack." Rather, Cooper believes that, "the mistakes made were mainly due to an inability to understand and exploit a fight in open country...after three years of stagnant trench warfare."
Easily the best part of The Ironclads of Cambrai is the number of first-person accounts from tankers. Despite their terrifying appearance to the German defenders, the early Mark IV tanks were virtually deaf and blind. One commander noted that, "once we started there was no co-operation between tanks, no tactics, no external command - only the objectives we had been given and the method of attack we had been taught during training." Visibility outside the tank was extremely limited through tiny slits and some of the armor was not entirely bulletproof. Oftentimes, German fire produced "spalling" or scabbing of the armor inside the tanks, requiring the crews to wear chain-mail face masks and body protection. Cooper also describes the various German ad hoc anti-tank tactics developed at Cambrai, ranging from throwing sandbags full of grenades under the tracks (successful), to jumping atop the tanks (fatal), to infantrymen attempting to hang on to the barrels of the tank's weapons (foolish).
Finally, Cooper spends the last couple of chapters discussing the German counterattack on 30 November 1917 that threw the British back on their heels. Most of the tanks were withdrawn by this stage, but those remaining played a major role in preventing a British catastrophe. Cooper is particularly scathing in detailing the whitewash effort by the court of inquiry after the battle, which blamed junior officers for the collapse instead of the complacent 3rd Army Commander (Gough). While Cambrai's glory turned sour for most in the wake of this turnabout, Cooper sees the battle as a vital step in establishing the credibility of the Tank Corps. Without Cambrai, the tanks might have remained a marginal weapon, used only in small numbers. Instead, Cambrai showed what large numbers of tanks could achieve under favorable circumstances and is best viewed as a successful experiment.
A refreshing changeThe fact that the tank was comming to the Western Front in ever increasing numbers would prove a death knel to imperial Germany. Whilst the comming arrival of American troops (who never really contributed to any overwhelming defeat of Germany) was on the German high command's radar; it was this opperation that forced the Germans to launch the disasterous "Kaiser's Battle" before British warfare adapted to a point where Germany could no longer defeat them. The book is packed with detail on who supported (Winston Churchill amongst others) this new method of warfare and who opposed it. An interesting addition to a military historians collection.


What a wonderful celebration of the horse!
quality photographs with wonderful captions

Essential Clan Source Book
Periphery Field Manual

Heartfelt voiceFair points out that we'd be creating a minority underclass without AA, and how this would increase tension and make society worse for everyone, minority or not. Most tellingly, Fair inserts his own personal experience as a child in a family with 10 kids. With no AA, people like him wouldve been left behind. An important read.
I feel you

Another fun mystery in the Old WestBecause the plot felt more like a conventional mystery, and because everything happened in an isolated setting that wasn't too different from resorts today, this installment lacked the distinctive historical feel of the first book. Ms. Bryan's colorful, entertaining characters made up for that, though. She creates vivid individuals that create strong impressions in the reader's mind. Maggie and Grady are fun to read about, and that's why I'm looking forward to their future adventures.
One quibble: it wouldn't break my heart to see the characters develop a little as the series progresses. In both books, Ms. Bryan drops hints about Maggie and Grady's lives when they aren't away solving crimes, but doesn't show us any more. I like Maggie and Grady, but I don't feel like I know enough about them to love them or be truly involved in their lives.
A really fun read!
The overwhelming mass of his story is about the Eastern Front. He provides many interesting anecdotes as well as numerous sidebars on tank development, tank types, and production issues. The book's principle failure though, is introduced by General Senger und Etterlin, whole was no stranger to armored warfare (as an aside, although SuE participated and many of the campaigns described, his name is nowhere else mentioned). General Senger wrote that there were three schools of thought on how tanks should have been employed before WWII. The implication is that the Germans picked one (perhaps the wrong one) and pursued it to its logical conclusion, which was not enough to win the war. Why this happened, and what debates existed in the German army thoughout the war, the author does not address again. Too bad, because the battle details are well known -- what is unknown is how the German reconciled the tactical and operational use of their "two armies."
More space should have gone to the African campaign, and how German victory in 1939-1940 influenced subsequent battles, especially in the East. Also, not every panzer general had the same background or the same experience. He should have highlighted more of these. Finally, the German use of armor after Dec 1941 is totally different than pre 1942 (possibly with the exception of Rommel). If the author could have identified that shift in usage and explained why it occurred, he would have made a great contribution to understanding mobile warfare as practiced by the Germans in WWII.
The appendices are very good, and there is also a fair amount of technical detail that doesn't bog you down.
So, if you have to have everything about panzers, it is a good buy. If you are looking for something with more conceptual substance or a more comprehensive look at German operations, you may be disappointed.